Android
not going slow. That horrible lag that haunts you at night is unusual in Android. Many users have finished hating a system for problems that are not the responsibility of the operating system of Google. The fault is not with the system itself, but with a roaming riddled with evil and useless applications optimized for hardware that is not even up to par.
Similarlycomputers, mobiles suffer greatly when they have to run several applications simultaneously. much more weight we put on Android, the harder it will respond as it should . This slowdown hardly appreciate it with the best phones, but the other, when we went out of their factory configuration errors begin to apparate.
all remember as our old Nokia lasted weeks and did wonders. But make no mistake, the software a few years ago has nothing to do with the present. Applications evolve and change hardware requirements. Not only this, the main problem we have is that as time passes our use is more intensive smartphone and use it for tasks that require greater load of the processor.
few years ago we were looking for the lightest browser, the more minimalist launcher and generally applications before we appreciated greatly if we see today seem too crappy for our Android . Returning to the analogy goes something like PC, initially had a terminal to play games in two dimensions, type some text and view web pages. Now even cheaper computer will ask you to move HD graphics, video editing, image editor and activated torrents. Regular use we give to our machines changes over time and this is where a good hardware have a lot time longer life.
Not all dual-core processors at 1.2 GHz are equal. Not all RAM running at the same speed and not all benchmarks are reliable. Each piece of hardware has a lot of different details , which ends up being a headache to find out if a processor provide a good experience or not. You know the nomenclature of PC graphics? A high-end GPU for several years is the equivalent of a current midrange. With SoC is the same, the best Snapdragon a couple of years is the equivalent of a CPU Snapdragon input as 400. This is a double-edged sword, as it makes a mobile is sufficiently powerful for a couple of years, and is not the same as a mobile become outdated after two years, three.
Most powerful processors not only show better scores in benchmarks. are much better prepared to handle various sensors at a time without incurring an extra charge, are active in a way more suited to our needs, the various nuclei overlockean when convenient and there SDKs specially designed to enhance performance . The Exynos early Galaxy have nothing to envy to the most recently sold Mediatek or lower-middle range of Qualcomm. In addition to these high-end smartphones possessed resolutions, battery, RAM and other components to your power chords .If we focus on the software, speed perception depends very much on what we are used to. One could think that once the Nexus One was going smoothly, but we also believe that with 800 Snapdragon no longer need. This smoothness when moving through the menus depends on, among other things, the launcher and the number of open applications.
Multitasking in Android reminds us when it became fashionable tasks killers. Does anyone remember them now? Again we return to an intrinsic problem of smartphone and not the system itself, since Android automatically manages memory each application and decides when to leave it in the background or close it. This multitasking plays a central role in performance.
Android is designed in such a way that encourages work with multiple services at once, which does not happen in other systems. So spending RAM is much higher. And devices with 1GB or less have enough problems designed to work for a while in various process versions. Svelte and Project KitKat tried the RAM is not a differentiator, extending the range of terminals that could take advantage of the other benefits of Android.
It is common practice that Android users install dozens of applications, but there phones are not designed for intense multitasking. Not even to have them installed in the light it is that we have lived so long with internal memories ridiculous.
As mentioned before, applications have changed much over the years. What in 2011 we considered a lightweight launcher is unlike what in 2013 see as minimalistic launcher. The applications themselves, with their animations and colorful designs are those that have improved, and therefore require more resources.
Android dir=”ltr”>experience Google does require quite high minimum requirements to work.
How cheap is expensive in the end. Yes, but an order with good reviews behind usually do well. As also usually correctly if we use time to fix and troubleshoot failures terminal. Many people buy cheap mobile blindly following a couple of specifications, guided by a commercial or by the size of the screen. In the world of Android, as elsewhere, reported a customer usually always better to stand out.
often low cost terminals are often poorly optimized versions of Android launchers old and consuming a huge amount of resources. These devices often cause a lot of headaches but nothing that a good optimized ROM can not fix.
If a tablet or smartphone Chinese can greatly improve a lite ROM, let alone a terminal pointer at the time such as a GalaxyS, behind a huge amount of developers. But not all solutions undergo root the terminal , we also have improvements that come from the manufacturers or Google itself.
Linaro in their day to extending the performance of Android, there have been improvements in reading and storage for those who complain about the lag, there lagfix for multiple devices and tablets. Android is a free system with applications to modify and greatly speed patterns that would normally be closed on other OS.
With these applications shows that there are many ways to improve the daily experience. Manufacturers however decide to go their own way and try to introduce more and more bloatware on their handsets. Applications constantly synchronized than for their high-end not a burden, but having them in their lower ranges becomes a nightmare for both storage and for performance. These efforts by us to use their own services should also be seen in the update to the latest version of Android.
A pity that those cheap phones almost never see the end KitKat. If things do not change may well until the end of next year we do not see KitKat devices as well. And with the improvements that are heading in that direction, it is a shame for who have an old cell phone and they can not be updated.
In comparison with other Android just seems to always losing systems. The smoothness of iOS or Windows Phone is beyond doubt while Android is criticized for using a Java virtual machine instead of native code to win millisecond response times. Google accepts these arguments and works hard to make the switch to ART as before, a machine that besides improved performance more efficiently take advantage of the additional cores of most processors.
But as said earlier, when we speak of a mobile slow to common user does not care about those milliseconds, which means is that applications open quickly and smoothly, it is not this where Android failure and cheap hardware itself. The WindowsPhone Samsung Touchwiz not come with a layer so aggressive, it belongs to Microsoft and Nokia are working together and the iPhone have always had a top processor. The image we have of these systems should be compared to a Nexus , where the set of software-maker is more united.
And this is where the time of Moto G, which is precisely to demonstrate that with a modest current hardware can achieve a satisfactory and sufficient experience for most users arrive. Hope the success of Motorola other manufacturers decide to bet on offer phones with lightweight and well optimized systems, and stop aside that race specification is the only thing that causes that create that they are still getting more bloatware without affecting the final result.
Android is an operating system with several years standing and powerful enough to have nothing to envy the rise of other systems in the input range. Companies know this, and despite attempts to create their own brands, many are embracing the Google experience. Android needs to improve a lot, but it is up to manufacturers to create handsets that can squeeze their potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment