Android is not a phone - The Confidential

Android is not a phone, is an operating system. Obvious to many, but with nuances and explanations necessary for the rest. Android phone is not that they give away in a newspaper by collecting stamps and paste them into a booklet. Not a pet friendly green.

not that carrying the superphone of your friend who claims to have spent seven euros and, to prove it, you realize that yes, you are right, but that the iPhone your sister is doing much better.

Nor is

all phones, or tablets , is all that added and expanded to sunglasses, watches, televisions, appliances and any other electronic device you can imagine.

It is not because you are not represented, but has to admit that yes, Android has, so I mentioned the nuances. Android triumph not only for its benefits as an operating system, but because many manufacturers can put on their phones, they are expensive or cheap.

Google

perfect tool gives a gorgeous mobile system with 700,000 applications available . Some make the software and other hardware , each specializing in their field, and that’s as it should be. A teamwork does not always pay off.

With Android

The popularization of smartphones is thanks to Android. The democratization of technology of consumption levels that had never come, and will be the next few years also to him.

However, there are those who criticize Android bring technology precisely who will not or can spend a lot of money. His argument is as elitist as myopic, a bad user experience , fragmentation live with different versions of the system, false freedom of boasting, or even an ugly terminal design (something that has nothing to do with Android).

Nothing that is intended for popularization going to be perfect, and you may be required perfect behavior in all its aspects (ie, on all devices with Android).

That’s the price you pay , a very low price considering what it means for humanity, yes, humanity, because mobile internet access, free messaging communication or free where and how information is, I consider an improvement of our society and our culture. And yes, there is a boost for the greedy capitalist consumption, is not going to be a beautiful valley open and free ideals.

Android is an operating system, and as such, has little or nothing to do with what they do with it few manufacturers or other, for better and for worse, it is.

Do not blame Android

Android is not to blame, but the manufacturer makes a bad use of it. Restrict their license who do evil for the benefit of the platform or ecosystem, would move towards a closed system in which end up being few enough to no longer fulfill its role of open system and popularizer.

Android is just the messenger, and even an operating system must be assessed on a hardware always , you must ensure that it interferes as little as possible, and that part for its use on a powerful support according to the requirements stated in this case, Google. A nobody would judge Windows running on a Nokia a few years ago, then, not do the same with Android.

Do not judge him wrongly

if not terminal testing a Nexus , where there if, it is your responsibility as the operating system performance. Nor is a far from perfect system, but it is Samsung , or LG , or HTC , or the Chinese mobile sell you $ 69 with a sticker of a green robot placed in its box.